CO129-024 - Bonham - 1848 [3-6] — Page 271

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

It is in my opinion much to be lamented that Contracts were permitted to be made for performing the works by piecemeal, for thus the Surveyor General never could, (until as in the present instance, at the near completion of the Church), discover what sum he would actually require for the whole service. In explanation I beg to enclose copy of Mr. Cleverly's letter Nr. 80 of the 22th December, 1846.

In Your Lordship's Despatch Nr. 34 of the 8th October, 1846, the sum of £6000 was sanctioned on the part of the Government for building a Church, and it is to be regretted that any change occurred afterwards, for Estimates sent home by Sir John Davis, in Despatch Nr. 131 of the 18th November 1846, (before the arrival of Despatch Nr. 34, already referred to), are now proved to be infinitely below the expenditure; in fact Mr Gordon's letter Nr. 66 of the 26th October, 1846,

4. and 233 J. H. (copy attached), anticipates a supplementary Estimate, as Mr Cleverly appears to have given full satisfaction to the Trustees, I do not attach any blame to him for the sum authorized and estimated for by Mr Gordon having been consumed without the Tower being included therein : this however, is so essential that I beg to recommend the further grant of £694.12 on behalf of the Government, for this service, on the condition that the remaining 3rd of £367, be made good by the inhabitants.

I beg also to add a letter from Major Aldrich, late Commanding Royal Engineer, of the 12th November, 1846, from which it will be apparent ; that he considered Mr Gordon's Estimate rather low in amount.

I have the honor to be, With the highest respect, Your Lordship's Most Obedient Humble Servant

Edit History

2026-05-17 03:25:17 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
It is in my opinion much to be lamented that Contracts were permitted to be made for performing the works by piecemeal, for thus the Surveyor General never could, (until as in the present instance, at the near completion of the Church), discover what sum he would actually require for the whole service. In explanation I beg to enclose copy of Mr. Cleverly's letter Nr. 80 of the 22th December, 1846. In Your Lordship's Despatch Nr. 34 of the 8th October, 1846, the sum of £6000 was sanctioned on the part of the Government for building a Church, and it is to be regretted that any change occurred afterwards, for Estimates sent home by Sir John Davis, in Despatch Nr. 131 of the 18th November 1846, (before the arrival of Despatch Nr. 34, already referred to), are now proved to be infinitely below the expenditure; in fact Mr Gordon's letter Nr. 66 of the 26th October, 1846, 4. and 233 J. H. (copy attached), anticipates a supplementary Estimate, as Mr Cleverly appears to have given full satisfaction to the Trustees, I do not attach any blame to him for the sum authorized and estimated for by Mr Gordon having been consumed without the Tower being included therein : this however, is so essential that I beg to recommend the further grant of £694.12 on behalf of the Government, for this service, on the condition that the remaining 3rd of £367, be made good by the inhabitants. I beg also to add a letter from Major Aldrich, late Commanding Royal Engineer, of the 12th November, 1846, from which it will be apparent ; that he considered Mr Gordon's Estimate rather low in amount. I have the honor to be, With the highest respect, Your Lordship's Most Obedient Humble Servant
Baseline (Original)
It is in my opinion much to be lamented that Contracts were : permitted to be made for performing the works by piceemual, for thus the Surveyor General never could, : (until as in the present instance, at the mear completion of the Church), discover what sum he would actually require for the whole service. In explanation I beg to enclose copy of Mr. Cleverly's letter Nr. 80 of the 22th December, 1846. In Your Lordship's Despatch Ma 34 of the 8th October, 1846, the sume of £6000 was sanctioned on the part of the Government the for building a Church, and it is to be regretted that any change occurred afterwards, for Estimates sent home by Sir John Davis, in Despatch N+131 of the 18th. November 1846. (before the arrival of Despatch N 34, already proved to be upon a seale : referred to), are now proved to be rep infinitely below the expenditure; in fact Mr Gordon's letter N. 66 of the 26th October, 1846, 4. and 233 J. H. (copy attached), anticipates a supplementary Estimate, as Mr Cleverly appears to have given full. satisfaction to the Fustees, I do not attach to 5. any blame to him for the sum authorized and estimated for by Mr Gordon having been consumed without the Tower being included therein : this however, is to oftential that I beg to recommend the further grant of £.694.12 on. : behalf of the Government, for this service, on the condition that the remaining 3rd of £367, be made good by the inhabitants. I bey also to add a letter from Major Mdrich, late Commanding Royal Engineer, of the 12 the November, 1846, from which it will be apparent ; that he considered Mr Gordon's Estimate rather low in amount I have the honor to be, With the highest respect, Your Lordship's Most Obedient Humble Servant
2026-05-17 03:25:17 · Baseline
View content

It is in my opinion much to be

lamented that Contracts were

: permitted to be

made for performing the works by piceemual, for thus the Surveyor General never could, : (until as in

the present instance, at the mear completion of the Church), discover what sum

he would actually require for the whole service. In explanation I beg to enclose copy of Mr. Cleverly's letter Nr. 80 of the 22th December,

1846.

In Your Lordship's Despatch Ma 34 of the 8th October, 1846, the sume of £6000

was sanctioned

on

the part of the Government

the

for building a Church, and it is to be regretted that any change occurred afterwards, for Estimates sent home by Sir John Davis, in Despatch N+131 of the 18th. November

1846.

(before the arrival of Despatch N 34, already

proved to be upon a seale

: referred to), are now proved to be rep

infinitely below the expenditure; in fact Mr Gordon's letter N. 66 of the 26th October, 1846,

4.

and

233

J. H. (copy attached), anticipates a supplementary Estimate,

as Mr Cleverly appears to have given full. satisfaction to the Fustees, I do not attach

to 5.

any

blame to him for the sum authorized and estimated

for by Mr Gordon having been consumed without the Tower being included therein : this however, is to oftential that I beg to recommend the further grant of £.694.12 on. : behalf of the Government, for this service, on the condition that the remaining 3rd of £367, be made good by the inhabitants.

I bey also to add a letter from Major Mdrich, late Commanding Royal Engineer, of the 12 the November, 1846, from which it will be apparent ; that he considered Mr Gordon's Estimate rather low

in amount

I have the honor to be,

With the highest respect,

Your Lordship's

Most Obedient

Humble Servant

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.